Thursday, March 27, 2014

MH370: Summary of Today's News

(1) Thai satellites identified about 300 object ranging from 1m to 15m floating about 200km
south-west from current search area

(2) China's vice-minister of Foreign Affairs Zhang Yesui visited 21 family members of the 154 Chinese passengers on board flight MH370 at the Bangi-Putrajaya Hotel

(3) Today's SAR was cut short before noon due to bad weather. However ships remain in search area while aircrafts turned back. Today's search covered 16,298 sq nautical miles in West sector (4 planes) and 6,506 sq nautical miles in East sector (5 planes)

(4) Insurance companies started to disburse insurance claims of victims

(5) Police will leave no stones unturned, says IGP

(6) Home Minister answered in parliament on how 2 Iranians entered with forged identities

(7) Malaysia is to send a team to Perth to assist in SAR mission involving DCA, MAS, TUDM and TLDM

(8) US Navy's Bluefin 21 autonomous submarine had arrived in Perth

(9) Family members of some victims onboard the ill-fated Flight MH370 are filing a RM4.95bil suit for compensation, against Boe­ing and Malaysia Airlines. Chicago-based firm Ribbeck Law Chartered, which is acting for the family members, has filed a petition of discovery in a court in Illinois, Chicago.

Monica Kelly, the lead lawyer from Ribbeck Law, said the firm which specialises in aviation law, had been approached by family members from China and Indonesia. Kelly said they spoke to family members in many countries and expected about half of those affected to take part in the suit.
“We have done many cases where wreckage was completely destroyed, or no bodies found, or wreckage found but no black boxes working. We are not relying on these things to start the legal process,” said Kelly, during a briefing to the press here.

She said such suits can take anywhere between four months to five years, but expects this case to take between one-and-a-half to two years.

The firm would focus its suit against Boeing, as they believe it was a case of equipment malfunction but could expand the defendants to include other component manufacturers or even those who trained

By M.Poobalan



the crew

No comments:

Post a Comment